Pendant que certains feignent y croire encore, 50 % des yankees n’y croient plus !
12 years after 911, 50% of Americans doubt official story
There is growing skepticism among a wide cross section of the American public about the official version dished out by the US government relating to the events of 911. A huge bill board in New York’s Times Square, paid for by architects and engineers raises certain pertinent questions among them the collapse of Building Number 7 that was not hit by a plane. The fire damage in the building was also minor.
New York, Crescent-online
September 11, 2013, 15:34 EDT
Twelve years after the events of 911, 50% of Americans do not believe the official version put out by the US government. This was confirmed by a new poll conducted by YouGov that also found that 10% of Americans do NOT believe the official version at all while another 12% are unsure what to believe.
A massive billboard erected in New York’s iconic Times Square asks Americans to “Rethink 911.” Paid for by American architects and structural engineers, the billboard raises the pertinent question about Building Number 7 that collapsed in controlled demolition-style without ever being hit by a plane. The number of architects and engineers that question the official version has swelled to several thousand.
Regardless of other details, the 47-storey Building Number 7 that was 350 feet away from the North Tower was not hit by any plane and sustained only minor fire damage. Yet, it collapsed demolition style around 5 pm the same day.
Architects and structural engineers have questioned how not one but two buildings would collapse in a controlled demolition after being hit by planes. Tall buildings are designed in such a way that they can sustain massive damage and still remain standing. Similarly, fire alone cannot destroy a building to bring it down in this manner as happened to Building Number 7.
Neither before nor after 911 has any building ever collapsed as a result of fire. All three buildings at the World Trade Centre—the North and South Towers and Building Number 7—collapsed on their own foot-print. This is classic demolition of buildings.
A Dutch demolition expert who was shown footage of the buildings collapsing without informing him where they were, said without hesitation, the buildings were brought down by explosives.
Larry Silverstein, the American-Jewish investor who had purchased all the buildings a mere two months prior to 911 insured the buildings that included “any terrorist attacks.” Silverstein had paid a mere $250 million for the WTC.
After the buildings’ collapse, he collected $7 billion in insurance through a court order. The insurance company was offering him $3.5 billion for all the buildings but Silverstein insisted that there were two separate attacks and he was entitled to double the compensation. The judge who awarded him $7 billion happened to be his friend and an arch Zionist like Silverstein.
There is another aspect to Silverstein’s admission regarding Building Number 7. He is on record as saying: “I remember getting a call from the fire department commander, telling me that they were not sure they were gonna be able to contain the fire [in Building 7], and I said, ‘You know, we’ve had such terrible loss of life, may be the smartest thing to do is, pull it?’ And they made that decision to pull it and then we watched the building collapse.”
How can a 47-storey building be brought down, demolition style without prior placement of explosives at strategic nodes in the building? Surely, in seven hours, it was impossible to place the explosives at such nodes for the building to be brought down on its own foot-print especially when it was already on fire?
The question, therefore, is when were these explosives placed on these buildings?
No US official has answered these simple questions about Building Number 7 or any of the other buildings. One wonders why?
Instead of taking refuge behind allegations of “conspiracy theories,” US officials should come clean and tell the American people who was really responsible for the attacks of 911 and the destruction of those buildings.
It is interesting to note that in his speech about attacking Syria last night (September 10), US President Barack Obama did not once mention 911, just a few hours before the anniversary of that tragic event. Why?
- Source :
http://www.crescent-online.net/2013/09/12-years-after-911-50-of-americans-doubt-official-story-wwwcrescent-onlinenet-4023-articles.html Vous pouvez commander le(s) livre(s) en cliquant sur l’image correspondante :